首页> 外文OA文献 >Contrasting adaptation responses by squatters and low-income tenants in Khulna, Bangladesh
【2h】

Contrasting adaptation responses by squatters and low-income tenants in Khulna, Bangladesh

机译:对比孟加拉国库尔纳的擅自占地者和低收入租户的适应性反应

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

This paper examines patterns of adaptive behaviour in low-income settlements(1) in Khulna, Bangladesh's third largest city. It contrasts the adaptive behaviours of "squatter" households who "own" their land with those of tenants who rent dwellings from private landlords, and finds significant differences between the adaptive behaviours of owners and renters. This is important, as most knowledge about low-income settlements in Bangladesh originates from "owned" settlements - often called "public settlements", as the land is officially public land. But the future growth of low-income settlements in the country is likely to be increasingly on private land, with rented dwellings. Policy lessons generated from settlements with "squatters" may be inappropriate for the next generation of "slums" that will house millions of rural migrants and people displaced by climate change. The conclusions argue that agencies seeking to assist low-income households in Bangladesh will need to craft different strategies for settlements according to different types of land tenure. © 2013 International Institute for Environment and Development (IIED).
机译:本文研究了孟加拉国第三大城市库尔纳(Khulna)的低收入住区的适应行为模式(1)。它把“拥有”土地的““屋”住户与租用私人房东的住户的适应行为进行了对比,发现所有者和租户的适应行为之间存在显着差异。这很重要,因为有关孟加拉国低收入住区的大多数知识都来自“拥有的”住区-通常被称为“公共住区”,因为这片土地是正式的公共土地。但是,该国低收入定居点的未来增长可能会越来越多地在私人土地上并租用住房。与“棚户区”定居点产生的政策教训可能不适用于下一代“贫民窟”,后者将容纳数百万农村移民和因气候变化而流离失所的人。结论认为,寻求援助孟加拉国低收入家庭的机构将需要根据不同类型的土地保有权制定不同的定居策略。 ©2013国际环境与发展研究所(IIED)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号